Editorial policy

We aim for careful, readable coverage of stadium design and spectator experience. Our work should make its reasoning visible, distinguish explanation from opinion and correct the record when we get something wrong.

Accuracy and context

We check names, descriptions and factual statements before publication and use sources suited to the claim being made. Broad design explanations should not be mistaken for a description of every ground. Where a detail is uncertain or varies by venue, we say so rather than smoothing away the difference.

Independence

Editorial decisions belong to the publication, not to a partner or advertiser. A commercial relationship does not buy favourable coverage, a particular conclusion or control over an editorial article.

Corrections

If you spot an error, contact us with the article and the detail in question. We review correction requests and update published material when warranted; significant changes should be made clear to readers.

Partnerships and illustrations

Paid or partner material is identified so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; when that is the case, we label them and do not present them as documentary photographs.